CI Studies Bibliography – Organizational

By tags: Animals | Architecture | Art and aesthetics | Borders and migration | Business & industry | City and urban studies | Cloud | Cyberinfrastructure for research | Development | Digital humanities | Disability & accessibility | Disaster | EconomicsEnergy | Environment | Ethnographical approaches | Feminist | Fiction | Higher educationInformation & IT | Institutional | Internet (& ICT) | Labor & work | Landscape | Large technical systems | Library, museum, and archive | Logistics | Media infrastructures | MilitaryMinimal computing | Mining, oil, & extractionMission critical | Object & thing studiesOrganizationalPhotography | Physical infrastructures | Platform studies | Poetry | PolicyPostcolonial & colonial | Race and ethnicity | Repair & care | Scientific research infrastructure | Security | Small technical systems | STS (science technology studies) |TelecommunicationsTransportationWaste, garbage, sewage | Water

There is broad overlap between the tags for “institutional” and “organizational” in the CI Studies Bibliography. While “institutional” (and “neoinstitutional”) approaches to organizations and their infrastructures are not necessarily the same as organization-studies, business-studies, and organizational-technology approaches, a hot spot of contemporary research in these fields is precisely the unstable relation of similarity/difference between institution and organization. There is much research, for example, on the way institutional conventions infused with social, cultural, symbolic, and other factors (housed in part in infrastructure and technology) impact organizational structures and their infrastructures and technologies.

Chan, Leslie. “Whose Open Science? And Why Infrastructure Matters.” presented at the OpenCon Cascadia, Portland, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2596865. Cite
Kirk, Ann M., EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, et al. Digital Humanities: A Framework for Institutional Planning (ECAR Working Group Paper). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, 2017. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/5/building-capacity-for-digital-humanities-a-framework-for-institutional-planning. Cite
Bilder, Geoffrey, Jennifer Lin, and Cameron Neylon. “Principles for Open Scholarly Infrastructure,” 2015. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1314859. Cite Download
Scott, W. Richard. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014. Cite
Besson, Patrick, and Frantz Rowe. “Strategizing Information Systems-Enabled Organizational Transformation: A Transdisciplinary Review and New Directions.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 21, no. 2 (2012): 103–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001. Cite
Cătălina Iederan, Oana, Petru Lucian Curşeu, Patrick A.M. Vermeulen, and Jac L.A. Geurts. “Cognitive Representations of Institutional Change: Similarities and Dissimilarities in the Cognitive Schema of Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 24, no. 1 (2011): 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111102265. Cite
Goodman, Paul S, and Lee Sproull. Technology and Organizations. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 2010. Cite
Leonardi, Paul M., and Stephen R. Barley. “What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing.” The Academy of Management Annals 4, no. 1 (2010): 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654160. Cite
Baptista (John), João, Sue Newell, and Wendy Currie. “Paradoxical Effects of Institutionalisation on the Strategic Awareness of Technology in Organisations.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 19, no. 3 (2010): 171–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.07.001. Cite
Bowker, Geoffrey C., Karen Baker, Florence Miller, and David Ribes. “Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment.” In In Hunsinger et Al. (Eds) International Handbook of Internet Research, 97–117. Springer, 2010. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.454.2119. Cite
Green, Sandy Edward, Yuan Li, and Nitin Nohria. “Suspended In Self-Spun Webs Of Significance: A Rhetorical Model Of Institutionalization And Institutionally Embedded Agency.” Academy of Management Journal 52, no. 1 (2009): 11–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36461725. Cite
Kim, Hee-Woong, and Atreyi Kankanhalli. “Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective.” MIS Quarterly 33, no. 3 (2009): 567–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309. Cite
Wulf, Volker, and Volkmar Pipek. “Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology.” Semantic Scholar, 2009. /paper/Infrastructuring%3A-Toward-an-Integrated-Perspective-Pipek-Wulf/7c825d377bd35ad8b0cf5af0746d07127cc2c380. Cite
Czarniawska, Barbara. “How Institutions Are Inscribed in Technical Objects and What It May Mean in the Case of the Internet.” In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector, edited by Francesco Contini and Giovan Francesco Lanzara, 49–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293_3. Cite
Jones, Matthew R., and Helena Karsten. “Giddens’s Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research.” MIS Quarterly 32, no. 1 (2008): 127–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148831. Cite
Thornton, Patricia H., and William Ocasio. “Institutional Logics.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 99–128. 1 Oliver’s Yard,  55 City Road,  London    EC1Y 1SP  United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4. Cite
Scott, W. Richard. “Lords of the Dance: Professionals as Institutional Agents.” Organization Studies 29, no. 2 (2008): 219–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088151. Cite
Powell, Walter W., and Jeannette Anastasia Colyvas. “New Institutionalism.” In International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, by Stewart Clegg and James Bailey. 2455 Teller Road,  Thousand Oaks  California  91320  United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956246.n336. Cite
Kraatz, Matthew S., and Emily S. Block. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 243–75. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore: SAGE, 2008. http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_orginstitution/n10.xml. Cite
Greenwood, Royston, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore: SAGE, 2008. http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_orginstitution. Cite
Pedersen, Jesper Strandgaard, and Frank Dobbin. “In Search of Identity and Legitimation: Bridging Organizational Culture and Neoinstitutionalism.” American Behavioral Scientist 49, no. 7 (2006): 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205284798. Cite
Kostova, Tatiana, and Kendall Roth. “Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects.” The Academy of Management Journal 45, no. 1 (2002): 215–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293. Cite
Greenwood, Royston, Roy Suddaby, and C. R. Hinings. “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.” Academy of Management Journal 45, no. 1 (2002): 58–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285. Cite
Heracleous, Loizos, and Michael Barrett. “Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation.” The Academy of Management Journal 44, no. 4 (2001): 755–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069414. Cite
Fountain, Jane E. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Cite
Henke, Christopher R. “The Mechanics of Workplace Order: Toward a Sociology of Repair.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1999–2000 (1999): 55–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41035546. Cite
Hoffman, Andrew J. “Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry.” The Academy of Management Journal 42, no. 4 (1999): 351–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/257008. Cite
Joerges, Bernward, and Barbara Czamiawska. “The Question of Technology, or How Organizations Inscribe the World.” Organization Studies 19, no. 3 (1998): 363–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900301. Cite Download
Chin, Wynne W., Abhijit Gopal, and W. David Salisbury. “Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation.” Information Systems Research 8, no. 4 (1997): 342–67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23010917. Cite
Winter, Susan J., and S. Lynne Taylor. “The Role of IT in the Transformation of Work: A Comparison of Post-Industrial, Industrial, and Proto-Industrial Organization.” Information Systems Research 7, no. 1 (1996): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.5. Cite
Orlikowski, Wanda J. “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective.” Information Systems Research 7, no. 1 (1996): 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.63. Cite Download
Weick, Karl E. “Organizational Redesign as Improvisation.” In Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance, 346–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. Cite
Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22, no. 4 (1993): 487–511. http://www.jstor.org/stable/658008. Cite
Greenwood, Royston, and C. R. Hinings. “Understanding Strategic Change: The Contribution of Archetypes.” The Academy of Management Journal 36, no. 5 (1993): 1052–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/256645. Cite
Orlikowski, Wanda J. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations.” Organization Science 3, no. 3 (1992): 398–427. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635280. Cite
Fligstein, Neil. “The Structural Transformation of American Industry: An Institutional Account of the Causes of Diversification in the Largest Firms, 1919-1979.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 311–36. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Galaskiewicz, Joseph. “Making Corporate Actors Accountable: Institution-Building in Minneapolis-St. Paul.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 293–310. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Friedland, Roger, and Robert R. Alford. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 232–63. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Orrù, Marco, Nicole Woolsey Biggart, and Gary G. Hamilton. “Organizational Isomorphism in East Asia.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 361–89. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Powell, Walter W. “Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 183–203. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Scott, W. Richard, and John W. Meyer. “The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 108–40. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Gioia, Dennis A., and Kumar Chittipeddi. “Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation.” Strategic Management Journal 12, no. 6 (1991): 433–48. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486479. Cite
Brint, Steven, and Jerome Karabel. “Institutional Origins and Transformations: The Case of American Community Colleges.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 337–60. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Oliver, Christine. “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.” The Academy of Management Review 16, no. 1 (1991): 145–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610. Cite
DiMaggio, Paul J. “Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920-1940.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 267–92. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Scott, W. Richard. “Unpacking Institutional Arguments.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 164–82. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Jepperson, Ronald L. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 143–63. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Zucker, Lynne G. “The Role of Institutionalism in Cultural Persistence.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 83–107. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization Fields.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 63–82. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite
Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. “Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 41–62. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991. Cite