CI Studies Bibliography – Institutional

By tags: Affordance theory | Animals | Architecture | Art and aesthetics | Borders and migration | Business & industry | City and urban studies | Cloud | Cyberinfrastructure for research | Data infrastructures | Development | Digital humanities | Disability & accessibility | Disaster | EconomicsEnergy | Environment | Ethnographical approaches | Feminist | Fiction | Higher educationInformation & IT | Institutional | Internet (& ICT) | Labor & work | Landscape | Large technical systems | Library, museum, and archive | LogisticsMaterials | Media infrastructures | MilitaryMinimal computing | Mining, oil, & extractionMission critical | Object & thing studiesOrganizationalPhotography | Platform studies | Poetry | PolicyPostcolonial & colonial | Race and ethnicity | Repair & care | Scientific research infrastructure | Security | Small technical systemsSocial justice | STS (science technology studies) | TelecommunicationsTransportationWaste, garbage, sewage | Water
ToC rev. 29 May 2022

There is broad overlap between the tags for “institutional” and “organizational” in the CI Studies Bibliography. While “institutional” (and “neoinstitutional”) approaches to organizations and their infrastructures are not necessarily the same as organization-studies, business-studies, and organizational-technology approaches, a hot spot of contemporary research in these fields is precisely the unstable relation of similarity/difference between institution and organization. There is much research, for example, on the way institutional conventions infused with social, cultural, symbolic, and other factors (housed in part in infrastructure and technology) impact organizational structures and their infrastructures and technologies.

Chesley, Amelia. “The In/Visible, In/Audible Labor of Digitizing the Public Domain.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 13, no. 2 (2019). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/13/2/000425/000425.html. Cite
Beyes, Timon. The Oxford Handbook of Media, Technology, and Organization Studies. 1st edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019. Cite
Latham, Alan, and Jack Layton. “Social Infrastructure and the Public Life of Cities: Studying Urban Sociality and Public Spaces.” Geography Compass 13, no. 7 (2019): e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12444. Cite
Chan, Leslie. “Whose Open Science? And Why Infrastructure Matters.” Presented at the OpenCon Cascadia, Portland, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2596865. Cite
Nieborg, David B, and Anne Helmond. “The Political Economy of Facebook’s Platformization in the Mobile Ecosystem: Facebook Messenger as a Platform Instance.” Media, Culture & Society 41, no. 2 (2019): 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818384. Cite
Boyles, Christina, Anne Cong-Huyen, Carrie Johnston, Jim McGrath, and Amanda Phillips. “Precarious Labor and the Digital Humanities.” American Quarterly 70, no. 3 (2018): 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2018.0054. Cite
Foka, Anna, Anna Misharina, Viktor Arvidsson, and Stefan Gelfgren. “Beyond Humanities qua Digital: Spatial and Material Development for Digital Research Infrastructures in HumlabX.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33, no. 2 (2018): 264–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx008. Cite
Ahuja, Nitin. “End Stages.” Places Journal, 2018. https://placesjournal.org/article/end-stages-hospice-design/. Cite
Liu, Alan. “Toward Critical Infrastructure Studies.” Critical Infrastructure Studies (CIstudies.Org) (blog), 2018. http://cistudies.org/wp-content/uploads/Toward-Critical-Infrastructure-Studies.pdf. Cite
Williamson, Ben. “The Hidden Architecture of Higher Education: Building a Big Data Infrastructure for the ‘Smarter University.’” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15, no. 12 (2018). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1186/s4123. Cite
Fidler, Bradley, and Andrew L. Russell. “Financial and Administrative Infrastructure for the Early Internet: Network Maintenance at the Defense Information Systems Agency.” Technology and Culture 59, no. 4 (2018): 899–924. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2018.0090. Cite
Critical Infrastructure Studies MLA 2018. “Session Description,” 2017. https://criticalinfrastructure.hcommons.org/session-description/. Cite
Kirk, Ann M., EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, et al. Digital Humanities: A Framework for Institutional Planning (ECAR Working Group Paper). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, 2017. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/5/building-capacity-for-digital-humanities-a-framework-for-institutional-planning. Cite
Liu, Alan. “Drafts for ‘Against the Cultural Singularity’ (Book in Progress).” WordPress. Alan Liu (blog), May 2, 2016. http://liu.english.ucsb.edu/drafts-for-against-the-cultural-singularity/. Cite
Svensson, Patrik. Big Digital Humanities: Imagining a Meeting Place for the Humanities and the Digital. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/dh.13607060.0001.001. Cite
Svensson, Patrik. “Humanities Infrastructure.” In Big Digital Humanities: Imagining a Meeting Place for the Humanities and the Digital, 131–71. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/dh.13607060.0001.001. Cite
Nowviskie, Bethany. “On Capacity and Care.” Blog. Bethany Nowviskie (blog), 2015. http://nowviskie.org/2015/on-capacity-and-care/. Cite
Scott, W. Richard. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014. Cite
Flanders, Julia. “Time, Labor, and ‘Alternate Careers’ in Digital Humanities Knowledge Work.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, Online., 292–308. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-88c11800-9446-469b-a3be-3fdb36bfbd1e/section/769e1bc9-25c1-49c0-89ed-8580290b7695. Cite
Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas Parke Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Anniversary ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2012. Cite
Besson, Patrick, and Frantz Rowe. “Strategizing Information Systems-Enabled Organizational Transformation: A Transdisciplinary Review and New Directions.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 21, no. 2 (2012): 103–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001. Cite
Cătălina Iederan, Oana, Petru Lucian Curşeu, Patrick A.M. Vermeulen, and Jac L.A. Geurts. “Cognitive Representations of Institutional Change: Similarities and Dissimilarities in the Cognitive Schema of Entrepreneurs.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 24, no. 1 (2011): 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111102265. Cite
Douglas, Mary. How Institutions Think. 11. Dr. The Frank W. Abrams Lectures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press, 2011. Cite
Mark, Gloria, and Norman Makoto Su. “Making Infrastructure Visible for Nomadic Work.” Pervasive and Mobile Computing 6, no. 3 (2010): 312–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2009.12.004. Cite
Leonardi, Paul M., and Stephen R. Barley. “What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing.” The Academy of Management Annals 4, no. 1 (2010): 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654160. Cite
Baptista (John), João, Sue Newell, and Wendy Currie. “Paradoxical Effects of Institutionalisation on the Strategic Awareness of Technology in Organisations.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 19, no. 3 (2010): 171–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.07.001. Cite
Bowker, Geoffrey C., Karen Baker, Florence Miller, and David Ribes. “Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment.” In In Hunsinger et al. (Eds) International Handbook of Internet Research, 97–117. Springer, 2010. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.454.2119. Cite
Wulf, Volker, and Volkmar Pipek. “Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology.” Semantic Scholar, 2009. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Infrastructuring%3A-Toward-an-Integrated-Perspective-Pipek-Wulf/3cf3cb7b44a5fb4259252492e9ff587f656e84c5. Cite
Green, Sandy Edward, Yuan Li, and Nitin Nohria. “Suspended In Self-Spun Webs Of Significance: A Rhetorical Model Of Institutionalization And Institutionally Embedded Agency.” Academy of Management Journal 52, no. 1 (2009): 11–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36461725. Cite
Kim, Hee-Woong, and Atreyi Kankanhalli. “Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective.” MIS Quarterly 33, no. 3 (2009): 567–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309. Cite
Czarniawska, Barbara. “How Institutions Are Inscribed in Technical Objects and What It May Mean in the Case of the Internet.” In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector, edited by Francesco Contini and Giovan Francesco Lanzara, 49–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293_3. Cite
Jones, Matthew R., and Helena Karsten. “Giddens’s Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research.” MIS Quarterly 32, no. 1 (2008): 127–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148831. Cite
Thornton, Patricia H., and William Ocasio. “Institutional Logics.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 99–128. 1 Oliver’s Yard,  55 City Road,  London    EC1Y 1SP  United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4. Cite
Scott, W. Richard. “Lords of the Dance: Professionals as Institutional Agents.” Organization Studies 29, no. 2 (2008): 219–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088151. Cite
Powell, Walter W., and Jeannette Anastasia Colyvas. “New Institutionalism.” In International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, by Stewart Clegg and James Bailey. 2455 Teller Road,  Thousand Oaks  California  91320  United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956246.n336. Cite
Kraatz, Matthew S., and Emily S. Block. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 243–75. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore: SAGE, 2008. http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_orginstitution/n10.xml. Cite
Greenwood, Royston, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore: SAGE, 2008. http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_orginstitution. Cite
Pedersen, Jesper Strandgaard, and Frank Dobbin. “In Search of Identity and Legitimation: Bridging Organizational Culture and Neoinstitutionalism.” American Behavioral Scientist 49, no. 7 (2006): 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205284798. Cite
Kostova, Tatiana, and Kendall Roth. “Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects.” The Academy of Management Journal 45, no. 1 (2002): 215–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293. Cite
Greenwood, Royston, Roy Suddaby, and C. R. Hinings. “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.” Academy of Management Journal 45, no. 1 (2002): 58–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285. Cite
Heracleous, Loizos, and Michael Barrett. “Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation.” The Academy of Management Journal 44, no. 4 (2001): 755–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069414. Cite
Fountain, Jane E. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Cite
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. Sorting Things out: Classification and Its Consequences. First paperback edition. Inside Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England: The MIT Press, 2000. Cite
Hoffman, Andrew J. “Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry.” The Academy of Management Journal 42, no. 4 (1999): 351–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/257008. Cite
Joerges, Bernward, and Barbara Czamiawska. “The Question of Technology, or How Organizations Inscribe the World.” Organization Studies 19, no. 3 (1998): 363–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900301. Cite
Chin, Wynne W., Abhijit Gopal, and W. David Salisbury. “Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation.” Information Systems Research 8, no. 4 (1997): 342–67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23010917. Cite
Orlikowski, Wanda J. “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective.” Information Systems Research 7, no. 1 (1996): 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.63. Cite
Weick, Karl E. “Organizational Redesign as Improvisation.” In Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance, 346–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. Cite
Freidson, Eliot. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Paperback ed., [4. Dr.]. Chicago, Ill.,: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1993. Cite
Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22, no. 4 (1993): 487–511. http://www.jstor.org/stable/658008. Cite
css.php